Subsidy hypothesis and strength of trophic cascades across ecosystems

  • Leroux S
  • Loreau M
  • 314

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 122

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Ecosystems are differentially open to subsidies of energy, material and organisms. This fundamental ecosystem attribute has long been recognized but the influence of this property on community regulation has not been investigated. We propose that this environmental attribute may explain variation in the strength of trophic cascades among ecosystems. Simply because of gravity, we should predict that systems with convex profiles receive low amounts of subsidies whereas systems with concave profiles act as spatial attractors, and receive high amounts of subsidies. The subsidy hypothesis states that ecosystems with high amounts of allochthonous inputs will experience the strongest trophic cascades. To test this hypothesis, we derive ecosystem models and investigate the effect of location and magnitude of subsidies on the strength of trophic cascades. Predictions from our models support the subsidy hypothesis and highlight the need to consider ecosystems as open to allochthonous flows.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Allochthonous
  • Control
  • Exogenous
  • Flows
  • Functioning
  • Inputs
  • Log-response ratio
  • Regulation
  • Top-down

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Shawn J. Leroux

  • Michel Loreau

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free