Journal article

Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses

Steedle J, Shavelson R ...see all

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 46, issue 6 (2009) pp. 699-715

  • 105


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 42


    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference


Assessments associated with learning progressions are designed to provide diagnostic information about the level and nature of student understanding. Valid interpretations of such diagnoses are only possible when students consistently express the ideas associated with a single learning progression level. Latent class analysis was employed to evaluate whether patterns of expected responses to diagnostic multiple-choice items afforded valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Results indicated that students with scientifically accurate understanding of the forces acting on an object with constant speed usually reasoned systematically across items, but many other students did not. Consequently, interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses on a proposed learning progression would often be invalid. Analyses of this sort would be useful in developing and validating future learning progressions

Author-supplied keywords

  • Cognitive development
  • Learning progressions
  • Middle school science
  • Physical science
  • Secondary

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Jeffrey T. Steedle

  • Richard J. Shavelson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free