The surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: a decision analysis

  • BRAUER C
  • GRAHAM B
  • 7

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The objective of our study was to use decision analysis to compare four common surgical treatments for cubital tunnel syndrome: simple decompression of the cubital tunnel, medial epicondylectomy, anterior subcutaneous transposition and anterior submuscular transposition. The variables used for this decision analysis model were based on data from the literature. Extensive sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the impact of the values given to these variables on the outcome of the model. The highest expected utility, 0.973, was associated with simple decompression. The expected utility was 0.969 for subcutaneous transposition and 0.965 for submuscular transposition. Medial epicondylectomy had the lowest expected utility at 0.961. Simple decompression remained the preferred strategy in extensive one-way sensitivity analyses.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
  • Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: diagnosis
  • Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: surgery
  • Decision Trees
  • Decompression
  • Elbow Joint
  • Elbow Joint: surgery
  • Humans
  • Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Postoperative Complications: etiology
  • Prognosis
  • Quality of Life
  • Surgical
  • Surgical: methods
  • Ulnar Nerve
  • Ulnar Nerve: surgery

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • C BRAUER

  • B GRAHAM

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free