Sustainability of healthcare improvement : what can we learn from learning theory?

  • Hovlid E
  • Bukve O
  • Haug K
 et al. 
  • 1

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changes that improve the quality of health care should be sustained. Falling back to old, unsatisfactory ways of working is a waste of resources and can in the worst case increase resistance to later initiatives to improve care. Quality improvement relies on changing the clinical system yet factors that influence the sustainability of quality improvements are poorly understood. Theoretical frameworks can guide further research on the sustainability of quality improvements. Theories of organizational learning have contributed to a better understanding of organizational change in other contexts. To identify factors contributing to sustainability of improvements, we use learning theory to explore a case that had displayed sustained improvement. METHODS: Forde Hospital redesigned the pathway for elective surgery and achieved sustained reduction of cancellation rates. We used a qualitative case study design informed by theory to explore factors that contributed to sustain the improvements at Forde Hospital. The model Evidence in the Learning Organization describes how organizational learning contributes to change in healthcare institutions. This model constituted the framework for data collection and analysis. We interviewed a strategic sample of 20 employees. The in-depth interviews covered themes identified through our theoretical framework. Through a process of coding and condensing, we identified common themes that were interpreted in relation to our theoretical framework. RESULTS: Clinicians and leaders shared information about their everyday work and related this knowledge to how the entire clinical pathway could be improved. In this way they developed a revised and deeper understanding of their clinical system and its interdependencies. They became increasingly aware of how different elements needed to interact to enhance the performance and how their own efforts could contribute.CONCLUSIONS: The improved understanding of the clinical system represented a change in mental models of employees that influenced how the organization changed its performance. By applying the framework of organizational learning, we learned that changes originating from a new mental model represent double-loop learning. In double-loop learning, deeper system properties are changed, and consequently changes are more likely to be sustained. [Abstract]

Author-supplied keywords

  • *organization
  • *total quality management
  • Change management
  • Clinical practice
  • Critical Pathways
  • General
  • General: organization & administration
  • Health Care
  • Health care
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Learning
  • Learning organisations
  • Models
  • Norway
  • Organisational learning
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Program Evaluation
  • Quality Assurance
  • Quality Improvement
  • Quality improvement
  • Surgery
  • Sustainability
  • Theoretical
  • article
  • care pathways
  • clinical pathway
  • general hospital
  • health care quality
  • human
  • learning
  • organization and management
  • theoretical model

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Einar Hovlid

  • Oddbjørn Oddbjorn Bukve

  • Kjell Haug

  • Aslak Bjarne Aslaksen

  • Christian von Plessen

  • Hovlid E.

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free