Symbolic versus modelistic elements in scientific modeling

4Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that symbols are conventional vehicles whose chief function is denotation, while models are epistemic vehicles, and their chief function is to show what their targets are like in the relevant aspects. And we explain why this is incompatible with the deflationary view on scientific modeling. Although the same object may serve both functions, the two vehicles are conceptually distinct and most models employ both elements. With the clarification of this point we offer an alternative account to the deflationary view - the Hybrid Account; and we defend our account in contrast with deflationism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, C. (2015). Symbolic versus modelistic elements in scientific modeling. Theoria (Spain), 30(2), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.12863

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free