A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: Implications for public health practice and research

100Citations
Citations of this article
237Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: We explored and analyzed how findings from public affairs research can inform public health research and practice, specifically in the area of interorganizational collaboration, one of the most promising practice-based approaches in the public health field. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the public affairs literature by following a grounded theory approach. We coded 151 articles for demographics and empirical findings (n=258). Results: Three primary findings stand out in the public affairs literature: network structure affects governance, management strategies exist for administrators, and collaboration can be linked to outcomes. These findings are linked to priorities in public health practice. Conclusions: Overall, we found that public affairs has a long and rich history of research in collaborations that offers unique organizational theory and management tools to public health practitioners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varda, D., Shoup, J. A., & Miller, S. (2012, March). A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: Implications for public health practice and research. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free