Systematic reviews: Do they raise more questions than they answer?

  • Kilminster S
  • 16

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 2

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Comments on an article by M. Gordon et al. (see record 2012-28577-005). The authors report a systematic review of studies that have examined the effectiveness and theoretical underpinnings of ‘non-technical skills training’ intended to enhance patient safety. The process of the review is reported carefully and enough details are given to allow anyone to repeat the review. Systematic reviews are mostly conducted to address important issues, but perhaps their very design is a chimera intended to clear all obstacles in their way. Systematic reviews ask specific questions, but actual practice consists of a myriad of complexities that intermingle and interact. The emphasis of systematic reviews is on the process and the technicality of the research; this commentary is a plea for recognition of the importance of its content. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved)

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Sue Kilminster

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free