Talking shop and shooting the breeze: A study of workplace conversation and job disengagement among STEM faculty

  • Holleran S
  • Whitehead J
  • Schmader T
 et al. 
  • 65


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 34


    Citations of this article.


Past research has examined women's subjective satisfaction in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), but the actual events that correlate with disengagement have not been identified. In this study, workplace conversations of 45 female and male STEM faculty were sampled using the Electronically Activated Recorder, a naturalistic observation method, coded for research or socializing content, and correlated with self-reported job disengagement. Both men and women were less likely to discuss research in conversations with female as compared to male colleagues, and when discussing research with men, women were rated as less competent than men. Consistent with the idea that women in STEM experience social identity threat, discussing research with male colleagues was associated with greater disengagement for women, whereas socializing with male colleagues was associated with less disengagement. These patterns did not hold for men. These findings point to the unique challenges women face in STEM disciplines.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Gender
  • Job disengagement
  • Naturalistic observation
  • Social identity threat

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Shannon E. Holleran

  • Jessica Whitehead

  • Toni Schmader

  • Matthias R. Mehl

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free