A Taxonomy to Compare SPI Frameworks

  • Halvorsen C
  • Conradi R
  • 25


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 27


    Citations of this article.


The principle behind software process improvement (SPI) is that product quality is strongly influenced by the quality of the associated software process for development and maintenance.
A number of SPI frameworks have evolved from this principle. However, these frameworks are comprehensive and differ in a variety of aspects, making
them difficult to compare objectively and to select between for a company. This paper discusses four comparison methods that
can be used on SPI frameworks. We have explored one of them further and propose a new SPI framework taxonomy. Our taxonomy consists of 25 relevant characteristics, which can be used to point out framework similarities and differences
on a high level. An example of how the taxonomy can be applied to six common SPI frameworks is provided.

Author-supplied keywords

  • cmm
  • ef
  • gqm
  • iec 15504
  • improvement
  • iso
  • iso 9000
  • qip
  • software process
  • spi
  • spice
  • spiq
  • tqm

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Christian Printzell Halvorsen

  • Reidar Conradi

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free