A Taxonomy to Compare SPI Frameworks

  • Halvorsen C
  • Conradi R
  • 27

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 28

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The principle behind software process improvement (SPI) is that product quality is strongly influenced by the quality of the associated software process for development and maintenance.
A number of SPI frameworks have evolved from this principle. However, these frameworks are comprehensive and differ in a variety of aspects, making
them difficult to compare objectively and to select between for a company. This paper discusses four comparison methods that
can be used on SPI frameworks. We have explored one of them further and propose a new SPI framework taxonomy. Our taxonomy consists of 25 relevant characteristics, which can be used to point out framework similarities and differences
on a high level. An example of how the taxonomy can be applied to six common SPI frameworks is provided.

Author-supplied keywords

  • cmm
  • ef
  • gqm
  • iec 15504
  • improvement
  • iso
  • iso 9000
  • qip
  • software process
  • spi
  • spice
  • spiq
  • tqm

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Christian Printzell Halvorsen

  • Reidar Conradi

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free