Teaching Reading and Spelling: Exclusion and Stimulus Equivalence

  • de Rose J
  • de Souza D
  • Hanna E
  • 9


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 94


    Citations of this article.


In Experiment 1, 7 nonreading children were exposed to a program designed to teach reading of 51 training words. The program featured an exclusion-based procedure in which the children (a) matched printed to dictated words and (b) constructed (copied) printed words with movable letters and named them. All children learned to read the training words. Five children also read generalization words and showed progress in spelling. Experiment 2 applied the program to 4 different children, omitting the word-construction task. They also learned to read the training words, but only 1 participant read generalization words. The data support a stimulus equivalence account of reading acquisition and suggest that reading generalization may be obtained, especially when the teaching program includes word construction.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Julio C. de Rose

  • Deisy G. de Souza

  • Elenice S. Hanna

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free