Technical efficiency in primary health care: Does quality matter?

  • L.R. M
  • C. P
  • 6


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


Abstract The accuracy required in the measurement of output is an issue that has as yet still not been satisfactorily addressed in empirical research on efficiency in primary health care. We exploit information retrieved from a newly constructed database (APEX06) for the Spanish region of Extremadura. The richness of our dataset allows us to consider original synthetic measures of output that take into account both the quantity and the quality of services provided by 85 primary care centers (PCCs) in 2006. We provide evidence that neglecting the issue of properly accounting for the quality of health services can lead to misleading results. Our main finding is that adjusting output for quality has a three-fold effect on efficiency analysis. Firstly, inefficiency explains relatively more of the deviation from potential output. Secondly, the average technical efficiency in the sector is lower, while its dispersion among PCCs is significantly higher. Thirdly, the efficiency rankingof the PCCs is affected. © Springer-Verlag 2010.

Author-supplied keywords

  • *health care delivery
  • *health care quality
  • *primary health care
  • article
  • clinical effectiveness
  • human
  • intermethod comparison
  • priority journal
  • quality control
  • quality of life index
  • theoretical model

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Murillo-Zamorano L.R.

  • Petraglia C.

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free