Terminology, Emphasis, and Utility in Validation

  • Kane M
  • 48

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Lissitz and Samuelsen (2007) have proposed an operational definition of validity that shifts many of the questions traditionally considered under validity to a separate category associated with the utility of test use. Operational definitions support inferences about how well peo- ple perform some kind of task or how they respond to some kind of stimulus. Such interpretations can be useful for some purposes, but they do not support any richer interpretations of scores. The author argues that validation should involve an evaluation of the proposed interpretations and uses of test scores. Test developers may choose to adopt a narrow operational interpretation of test scores, but if they do so, they should label the test accordingly.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Authors

  • M. T. Kane

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free