Terrorism’s psychologic effects and their implications for primary care policy, research, and education

  • Eisenman D
  • Stein B
  • Tanielian T
 et al. 
  • 1


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


Abstract  This paper examines primary care physicians’ (PCP) roles in helping the nation prepare for, respond to, and recover from the psychologic consequences of chemical, biologic, radiologic, or nuclear (CBRN) terrorism. First, we discuss the psychologic consequences of a CBRN attack and PCPs’ roles in responding to these consequences. Second, we analyze these roles in light of the known barriers to delivering high-quality, primary care-based, mental health care. Third, we offer recommendations for mitigating these barriers and preparing PCPs to respond to the psychosocial consequences of a CBRN weapon. Importantly, our recommendations provide dual-use benefits to PCPs faced with the daily concerns of primary care mental health, including improved linkages and electronic connectivity with mental health, information technology, and decision support for providers, and needed education and research.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

There are no full text links


  • David Eisenman

  • Bradley Stein

  • Terri Tanielian

  • Harold Pincus

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free