Skip to content
Journal article

Toward More Substantively Meaningful Automated Essay Scoring

Ben-Simon A, Bennett R ...see all

The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, vol. 6, issue 1 (2007) pp. 1-47

  • 35

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 21

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

Tis study evaluated a “substantively driven” method for scoring NAEP writing assess- ments automatically. Te study used variations of an existing commercial program, e-rater®, to compare the performance of three approaches to automated essay scoring: a brute-empirical approach in which variables are selected and weighted solely accord- ing to statistical criteria, a hybrid approach in which a fixed set of variables more closely tied to the characteristics of good writing was used but the weights were still statisti- cally determined, and a substantively driven approach in which a fixed set of variables was weighted according to the judgments of two independent committees of writing experts. Te research questions concerned (a) the reproducibility of weights across writing experts, (b) the comparison of scores generated by the three automated approaches, and (c) the extent to which models developed for scoring one NAEP prompt generalize to other NAEP prompts of the same genre. Data came from the 2002 NAEP Writing Online study and from the main NAEP 2002 writing assessment. Results showed that, in carrying out the substantively driven approach, experts initially assigned weights to writing dimensions that were highly similar across committees but that diverged from one another after committee 1 was shown the empirical weights for possible use in its judgments and committee 2 was not shown those weights. Te substan- tively driven approach based on the judgments of committee 1 generally did not operate in a markedly different way from the brute empirical or hybrid approaches in most of the analyses conducted. In contrast, many consistent differences with those approaches were observed for the substantively driven approach based on the judgments of com- mittee 2. Tis study suggests that empirical weights might provide a useful starting point for expert committees, with the understanding that the weights be moderated only somewhat to bring them more into line with substantive considerations. Under such circumstances, the results may turn out to be reasonable, though not necessarily as highly related to human ratings as statistically optimal approaches would produce.

Author-supplied keywords

  • automated essay scoring
  • writi
  • writing assessment

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

  • PUI: 47191355
  • SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-34547602972
  • ISSN: 1540-2525
  • SGR: 34547602972

Authors

  • Anat Ben-Simon

  • Randy Elliot Bennett

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below