A tracer experiment to study flow paths of water in a forest soil

35Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This contribution discusses a tracer experiment, which was performed to study the flaw paths of water in a macroporous forest soil. The experiment was performed in the framework of a study on the cycling of nitrogen in forested Prealpine catchments, in which losses of nitrate from virtually pristine areas were observed. Two soil plots with distinct micro-topography and top-soil were investigated: a well drained mar humus on a mound and a wet muck humus in a small depression. To reveal the effect of the soil horizons on the flow regime, tracers were applied both onto the soil surface and injected into the sub-soil. Tracers injected directly into the gleyic sub-soil reached the outlet (at a distance of 3.3 m) about 1000 times faster than could be expected from the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil matrix. Peak concentrations were observed after 18 (muck humus, tracer recovery 31%) to 70 min (mar humus, tracer recovery 40%). The peak concentration was 10 times smaller on the drier mar humus plot as compared to the muck humus. The mobile water content of the sub-soil varied between 0.5 (muck humus) and 1.3% (mar humus) of the total available soil water. The discrepancy in residence time, peak concentration and volume of mobile water between both sub-soils can be attributed to the differently structured sub-soil (longer travel distance and mixing volume in the drier mar humus). Tracers applied onto the soil surface resulted in a much slower breakthrough (tracer peaks after 400-700 min). Thus, in contrast to the sub-soil, flow through the matrix was the predominating transport process in the upper humus layers of both plots.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feyen, H., Wunderli, H., Wydler, H., & Papritz, A. (1999). A tracer experiment to study flow paths of water in a forest soil. Journal of Hydrology, 225(3–4), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00159-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free