This study examines the language-driven aspects of the formation of a class- room-based community of practice (CoP), placing emphasis on ways in which researchers can verify the status of observed practices. Discourse analysis is reinforced by such an evidence-based understanding of the social milieu of a research site. When determining whether an aggregate of people is functioning as a CoP, however, the nature of the measuring stick is a vital question. When institutional forces have brought a group of partici- pants together, howcan an observer verify empirically the dynamic develop- ment of mutual engagement, joint enterprise, and shared repertoire? In a sample case study, representative features outlined by Wenger (1998:130– 31) are identified, and their emergence traced, via analysis of ethnographic fieldnotes and audio recordings. These features provide evidence of the de- velopment of localised practices (i.e.ways of doing grounded in this commu- nity) as distinct from more widely recognisable practices. Identifying the difference increases the likelihood that results of discourse analysis can be useful to educators.
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research
Choose a citation style from the tabs below