Does transfusion practice affect mortality in critically ill patients? Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

  • Hébert P
  • Wells G
  • Tweeddale M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 4,470 critically ill patients, we examined the impact of transfusion practice on mortality rates. As compared with survivors, patients who died in intensive care units (ICU) had lower hemoglobin values (95 +/- 26 versus 104 +/- 23 g/L, p < 0.0001) and were transfused red cells more frequently (42.6% versus 28.0%, p < 0.0001). In patients with cardiac disease, there was a trend toward an increased mortality when hemoglobin values were < 95 g/L (55% versus 42%, p = 0.09) as compared with anemic patients with other diagnoses. Patients with anemia, a high APACHE II score (> 20), and a cardiac diagnosis had a significantly lower mortality rate when given 1 to 3 or 4 to 6 units of allogeneic red cells (55% [no transfusions] versus 35% [1 to 3 units] or 32% [4 to 6 units], respectively, p = 0.01). Adjusted odds ratio (OR) predicting survival were 0.61 (95% CI; 0.37 to 1.00, p = 0.026) after 1 to 3 units and 0.49 (95% CI; 0.23 to 1.03, p = 0.03) after 4 to 6 units compared with nontransfused anemic patients. In the subgroup with cardiac disease, increasing hemoglobin values in anemic patients was associated with improved survival (OR = 0.80 for each 10 g/L increase, p = 0.012). We conclude that anemia increases the risk of death in critically ill patients with cardiac disease. Blood transfusions appear to decrease this risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hébert, P. C., Wells, G., Tweeddale, M., Martin, C., Marshall, J., Pham, B., … Pagliarello, G. (1997). Does transfusion practice affect mortality in critically ill patients? Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 155(5), 1618–1623. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154866

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free