Transthoracic impedance changes as a tool to detect malpositioned tracheal tubes

22Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Undetected malpositioned or dislodged ventilation tubes during cardiac arrest have fatal consequences, and no single method can detect the tube position reliably during such low-flow states. We wanted to test the ability of impedance changes as measured across the chest via the standard defibrillation pads to distinguish between oesophageal and tracheal ventilations in non-circulated patients. Materials and methods: After the end of futile resuscitation transthoracic impedance was measured with a prototype defibrillator, and ventilation variables were collected with a spirometer-capnography unit during tracheal ventilations and after repositioning of the tube; during oesophageal ventilations for paired comparisons. Results: We registered 123 oesophageal and 178 tracheal ventilations in nine patients. Transthoracic impedance changes associated with ventilations were always larger during tracheal than oesophageal ventilations (mean difference 1.3 Ω (95% CI 1.0, 1.5), P < 0.001), and all such changes above 1.2 Ω were associated with tracheal ventilations, while changes below 0.4 Ω always were associated with oesophageal ventilations. By subtracting 0.5 Ω from the individual mean transthoracic change associated with tracheal ventilations, tube position was predicted with sensitivity 0.99 and specificity 0.97. Conclusion: Transthoracic impedance changes may be used to detect malpositioned and dislodged tubes also during situations without spontaneous circulation. Our predictive values must be retested in another population. © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kramer-Johansen, J., Eilevstjønn, J., Olasveengen, T. M., Tomlinson, A. E., Dorph, E., & Steen, P. A. (2008). Transthoracic impedance changes as a tool to detect malpositioned tracheal tubes. Resuscitation, 76(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.07.021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free