Journal article

Triangulation in qualitative tourism research

Decrop A ...see all

Tourism Management, vol. 20, issue 1 (1999) pp. 157-161

  • 252

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 147

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

Qualitative research in tourism is often blamed for missing the tenets of 'good' science. There are two major reasons for this. On one hand, positivism is still the prevailing paradigm in many areas of tourism research. On the other hand, qualitative researchers often fail to explain how and why their methods are sound. This results in confusion and misunderstandings. In this paper, basic criteria to assess the trustworthiness of a qualitative study are listed, and triangulation is proposed as a way to implement them. Refining the concepts of corroboration and validation, triangulation consists of strengthtening qualitative findings by showing that several independent sources converge on them, or at least, do not oppose them. Denzin's four basic types of triangulation (i.e. data, method, investigator and theoretical triangulation) are described and illustrated by appropriate tourism examples.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Interpretivism
  • Positivism
  • Tourism
  • Triangulation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Alain Decrop

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free