Are Two Interventions Worse Than None? Joint Primary and Secondary Prevention of Eating Disorders in College Females

  • Mann T
  • Nolen-Hoeksema S
  • Huang K
 et al. 
  • 58

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 140

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Prevention programs for eating disorders attempt to simultaneously prevent new cases from arising (primary prevention) and encourage students who already have symptoms to seek early treatment (secondary prevention), even though ideal strategies for these 2 types of prevention may be incompatible with each other. In the present study, an eating disorder prevention program was evaluated in a simple of female college freshmen. In the intervention, classmates who had recovered from eating disorders described their experiences and provided information about eating disorders. At follow-up, intervention participants had slightly more symptoms of eating disorders than did controls. The program may have been ineffective in preventing eating disorders because by reducing the stigma of these disorders (to encourage students with problems to seek help), the program may have inadvertently normalized them.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Eating disorders
  • Primary prevention
  • Secondary prevention

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Susan Nolen-Hoeksema

  • Karen Huang

  • Debora Burgard

  • Alexi Wright

  • Kaaren Hanson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free