The conventional understanding of the contemporary US as a polyarchy, considered as rule by multiple minorities, is not now supportable. It relies upon the salience of pluralism over political inequality, but these conditions are now inverted. The current salience of political inequality is the chief characteristic of unequalocracy, a political system type intermediate between polyarchy and plutocracy. Contrary to Gilens and Bartels, the US has not been demonstrated to have enough representational inequality to be a plutocracy. Using an alternative conception of what constitutes preference differences between high- and low-income groups, and applying it to Gilens’ own data, I find too few preference differences to show plutocracy exits in the US.
CITATION STYLE
Zucker, R. (2016). What type of political system is the US? Forthcoming in the Journal of Political Power. Journal of Political Power, 9(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2016.1149336
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.