Unannounced standardised patients in real practice: A systematic literature review

  • Rethans J
  • Gorter S
  • Bokken L
 et al. 
  • 63


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 60


    Citations of this article.


BACKGROUND: No attempt has been made to give a systematic overview of the innovative use of unannounced or incognito standardised patients. OBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic overview of all published studies with incognito standardised patients assessing doctors in actual practice situations using sound reliable and valid standardised patient methodology. METHODS: Systematic literature search in Medline, Eric and Psyclit with piloted search terms, followed by retrieving additional papers from reference lists. All papers were scored with a predefined protocol-sheet using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Forty papers referring to 21 projects with incognito standardised patients were found and described in detail. The majority of studies were conducted in primary care and were descriptive. DISCUSSION: There is a need for research on the additional value of the incognito standardised patient methodology and for a consensus on how to report on accuracy and consistency of standardised patients.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Clinical competence/ *standards
  • Education, medical
  • Patient simulation
  • Review [publication type]

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Jan Joost Rethans

  • Simone Gorter

  • Lonneke Bokken

  • Linda Morrison

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free