Journal article

Undisturbed and disturbed above canopy ponderosa pine emissions: PTR-TOF-MS measurements and MEGAN 2.1 model results

Kaser L, Karl T, Guenther A, Graus M, Schnitzhofer R, Turnipseed A, Fischer L, Harley P, Madronich M, Gochis D, Keutsch F, Hansel A ...see all

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 13, issue 23 (2013) pp. 11935-11947

  • 26


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 20


    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference


We present the first eddy covariance flux measurements of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS) above a ponderosa pine forest in Colorado, USA. The high mass resolution of the PTR-TOF-MS enabled the identification of chemical sum formulas. During a 30 day measurement period in August and September 2010, 649 different ion mass peaks were detected in the ambient air mass spectrum (including primary ions and mass calibration compounds). Eddy covariance with the vertical wind speed was calculated for all ion mass peaks. On a typical day, 17 ion mass peaks, including protonated parent compounds, their fragments and isotopes as well as VOC-H+-water clusters, showed a significant flux with daytime average emissions above a reliable flux threshold of 0.1 mg compound m(-2) h(-1). These ion mass peaks could be assigned to seven compound classes. The main flux contributions during daytime (10:00-18:00 LT) are attributed to the sum of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol (MBO) and isoprene (50 %), methanol (12 %), the sum of acetic acid and glycolaldehyde (10%) and the sum of monoterpenes (10 %). The total MBO + isoprene flux was composed of 10 % isoprene and 90 % MBO. There was good agreement between the light-and temperature dependency of the sum of MBO and isoprene observed for this work and those of earlier studies. The above canopy flux measurements of the sum of MBO and isoprene and the sum of monoterpenes were compared to emissions calculated using the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN 2.1). The best agreement between MEGAN 2.1 and measurements was reached using emission factors determined from site-specific leaf cuvette measurements. While the modeled and measured MBO + isoprene fluxes agree well, the emissions of the sum of monoterpenes is underestimated by MEGAN 2.1. This is expected as some factors impacting monoterpene emissions, such as physical damage of needles and branches due to storms, are not included in MEGAN 2.1. After a severe hailstorm event, 22 ion mass peaks (attributed to six compound classes plus some unknown compounds) showed an elevated flux for the two following days. The sum of monoterpene emissions was 4-23 times higher compared to emissions prior to the hailstorm while MBO emissions remained unchanged. The monoterpene emission (in mg compound m(-2)) during this measurement period is underestimated by 40 % if the effect of this disturbance source is not considered.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • L. Kaser

  • T. Karl

  • A. Guenther

  • M. Graus

  • R. Schnitzhofer

  • A. Turnipseed

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free