Uniform reporting of measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)

  • Kramer-Johansen J
  • Edelson D
  • Losert H
 et al. 
  • 70

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 133

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Background: CPR quality is an important determinant of cardiac arrest outcome. Recent investigations have demonstrated that quality of clinical CPR is variable and often not in compliance with international consensus guidelines. The 2005 update of these guidelines included new recommendations for the measurement of resuscitation and CPR performance and the institution of measures to improve resuscitation care. Common definitions and reporting templates need to be established for the variables of CPR quality. This will allow for meaningful comparisons between treatment groups in clinical trials as well as a common system for quality improvement and documentation of this improvement. Methods/results: In this report, we present the results from an international consensus working group to propose common definitions and criteria for reporting variables of CPR quality, based on the best available data for the importance of various CPR variables. The recommendations are discussed in light of the different purposes outlined above. © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
  • Clinical trials
  • Health care quality assessment

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Jo Kramer-Johansen

  • Dana P. Edelson

  • Heidrun Losert

  • Klemens Köhler

  • Benjamin S. Abella

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free