Urban growth boundaries: An effective second-best remedy for unpriced traffic congestion?

76Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper evaluates the efficacy of the urban growth boundary (UGB) as a second-best substitute for a first-best toll regime in a congested city. Numerical results show that, while a UGB is welfare-improving, validating previous theoretical results, the utility gain it generates is a very small fraction of that achieved under a toll regime. Thus, the paper suggests that a UGB may not be a useful instrument for attacking the distortions caused by unpriced traffic congestion. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brueckner, J. K. (2007). Urban growth boundaries: An effective second-best remedy for unpriced traffic congestion? Journal of Housing Economics, 16(3–4), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2007.05.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free