Using complexity-consistent theory for evaluating complex systems

  • Westhorp G
  • 140

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 33

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

This article draws on two recent traditions in evaluation methodology, one grounded in complexity theory and the other in a realist philosophy of science. Sometimes seen as incompatible, it is argued here that complexity theory and realist evaluation are ‘natural bedfellows’. Because of their similarities and differences, evaluators can usefully draw on both perspectives within the same evaluation. One way to do so is to draw on key concepts from each in the selection and use of substantive theory. The article introduces the concept of ‘complexity-consistent’ substantive theories and suggests that this is useful for the evaluation of policies and programs in complex adaptive systems. It demonstrates how substantive theories can be analysed in complexity terms, how multiple theories can be ‘layered’ to reflect multiple levels of systems, and how such theories can be used within evaluation design and analysis.

Author-supplied keywords

  • complexity theory
  • complexity-consistent theory
  • realist evaluation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Gill Westhorp

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free