Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact

ISSN: 01615505
317Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Perfusion-scan fixed defects may result from soft tissue attenuation, decreasing test specificity for coronary disease and myocardial infarction (MI), Gated 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT may help differentiate MI from artifact since fixed defects with decreased function (wall motion and thickening) probably represent MI, whereas attenuation artifacts either have normal function or at least do not demonstrate markedly reduced function. Methods: Ungated resting and gated stress 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT was performed in 551 consecutive patients referred for evaluation of coronary disease. From resting and summed gated stress images, 180 patients (33%) were identified with isolated fixed defects. Function of the defects was assessed subjectively from gated stress images and results were correlated with clinical (history and/or ECG Q-waves) evidence of MI. Results: Of 102 patients with fixed defects and clinical MI, 98 (96%) had abnormal defect function. Of 78 patients with no clinical MI, 18 (23%) had decreased function of the defect, possibly indicating silent MI. In 60 of the 78 patients (77%) with no clinical MI, defect function was normal. Because most (91%) of fixed defects with normal systolic function occurred in women with anterior fixed defects (48%) or men with inferior fixed defects (43%), these were most likely attenuation artifacts. By reclassifying patients with fixed defects and normal function as normal, patients with unexplained fixed defects (no clinical MI) decreased from 14% to 3%. Conclusion: Gating provides a valuable adjunct to 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT in characterizing fixed defects and potentially improving test specificity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DePuey, E. G., & Rozanski, A. (1995). Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 36(6), 952–955.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free