Using persuasive messages to encourage hunters to support regulation of lead shot

  • Schroeder S
  • Fulton D
  • Penning W
 et al. 
  • 26

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 5

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Lead shot from hunting adds the toxic metal to environments worldwide. The United States banned lead shot for hunting waterfowl in 1991 and 26 states have lead shot restrictions beyond those mandated for waterfowl hunting. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(MDNR) was interested in studying hunter attitudes about expanded restrictions on the use of lead shot for hunting small game to understand what communication strategies might increase public support for potential restrictions on lead shot. We mailed messages about lead shot, including 1,200 control messages and 400 of each of 9 treatment messages, and surveys to 4,800 resident small game hunters.Wecompared attitudes and intentions related to a possible ban among control and treatment groups. Compared to the control message, all treatment messages elicited more positive attitudes and intentions to support a ban. A basic factual message, messages with references to Ducks Unlimited, and a first-person narrative message generated the strongest support for a ban. Results also demonstrated a substantial relationship between the use of lead shot and response to persuasive messages supporting a ban.  2012 The Wildlife Society.

Author-supplied keywords

  • communication experiment
  • hunting
  • lead shot
  • persuasion

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Susan A. Schroeder

  • David C. Fulton

  • William Penning

  • Kathy Doncarlos

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free