Usual care as the control group in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions

  • Thompson B
  • Schoenfeld D
  • 3


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


We discuss the pros and cons of including usual care as a control arm in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions. Usual care is a term used to describe the full spectrum of patient care practices in which clinicians have the opportunity (which is not necessarily seized) to individualize care. The decision to use usual care as the control arm should be based on the nature of the research question and the uniformity of usual-care practices. The use of a usual-care arm in a two-arm trial should be considered for trials of investigational drugs or devices, for trials that propose to test interventions that lie well outside usual-care practices, or for trials where the research question per se is to compare a strategy against usual care. Examples of the latter include pragmatic effectiveness trials of clinical pathways or protocolized-care versus usual-care practices. Randomized intervention trials can be safely conducted and monitored using two treatments that lie within the range of usual-care practices if both approaches are considered prudent and good care for the target population.

Author-supplied keywords

  • *Control Groups
  • *Intensive Care
  • Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/*methods
  • Terminology as Topic

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in


  • B T Thompson

  • D Schoenfeld

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free