Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Unrealistic Relationship Expectations

16Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cognitive models of intimate partner aggression implicate maladaptive relationship beliefs as antecedents to aggression and targets for intervention. However, existing self-report measures of relationship beliefs have failed to differentiate aggressive and nonaggressive individuals, raising questions about their assessment of and role in understanding aggression. To address these concerns, the authors developed and tested a new measure of unrealistic relationship beliefs in a sample of 453 community couples. Structural validity, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and temporal stability of the new measure were examined. The final scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency (αs = .83-.84), test-retest reliability (rs = .68-.74), and concurrent validity (small to moderate associations with predicted variables). Unrealistic relationship beliefs significantly differentiated aggressive and nonaggressive men, and this association remained significant after the authors controlled for other related variables. © 2007 American Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foran, H. M., & Smith Slep, A. M. (2007). Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Unrealistic Relationship Expectations. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.382

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free