Validity of physical activity intensity predictions by ActiGraph, actical, and RT3 accelerometers

  • Rothney M
  • Schaefer E
  • Neumann M
 et al. 
  • 124

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 83

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Accelerometers are promising tools for characterizing physical activity (PA) patterns in free-living persons. To date, validation of energy expenditure (EE) predictions from accelerometers has been restricted to short laboratory or simulated free-living protocols. This study seeks to determine the capabilities of eight previously published regression equations for three commercially available accelerometers to predict summary measures of daily EE. Methods and Procedures: Study participants were outfitted with ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 accelerometers, while measurements were simultaneously made during overnight stays in a room calorimeter, which provided minute-by-minute EE measurements, in a diverse subject population (n = 85). Regression equations for each device were used to predict the minute-by-minute metabolic equivalents (METs) along with the daily PA level (PAL). Results: Two RT3 regressions and one ActiGraph regression were not significantly different from calorimeter measured PAL. When data from the entire visit were divided into four intensity categories —sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous—significant (P < 0.001) over- and underpredictions were detected in numerous regression equations and intensity categories. Discussion: Most EE prediction equations showed differences of

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Megan P. Rothney

  • Emily V. Schaefer

  • Megan M. Neumann

  • Leena Choi

  • Kong Y. Chen

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free