Value and exchange in law and economics: Buchanan versus posner

  • Marciano A
  • 6

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 5

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Meir Kohn's Exchange and Value claims that economics can be characterised around two opposed paradigms, the exchange and the value paradigms. In this paper, we apply this dichotomy to characterise the analyses proposed by economists in the field known as "law and economics". We compare and contrasts the perspectives proposed by two prominent scholars - James Buchanan and Richard Posner - and argue that they respectively represent the exchange and the value paradigm in law and economics. More precisely, we show that Buchanan sticks to a definition of economics based on the exchange paradigm, and this leads him to define law and economics in a rather specific, different, narrower than Posner's way to define law and economics - a definition that corresponds to a conception of economics based on the value paradigm.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Buchanan
  • Economic analysis of law
  • Exchange
  • Law and economics
  • Political economy
  • Posner
  • Subject matter
  • Value

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free