Variability in ecosystem service measurement: A pollination service case study

  • Liss K
  • Mitchell M
  • Macdonald G
 et al. 
  • 134


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 17


    Citations of this article.


Research quantifying ecosystem services (ES) – collectively, the benefits that society obtains from ecosystems – is rapidly increasing. Despite the seemingly straightforward definition, a wide variety of methods are used to measure ES. This methodological variability has largely been ignored, and standard protocols to select mea- sures that capture ES provision have yet to be established. Furthermore, most published papers do not include explicit definitions of individual ES. We surveyed the literature on pollination ES to assess the range of mea- surement approaches, focusing on three essential steps: (1) definition of the ES, (2) identification of compo- nents contributing to ES delivery, and (3) selection of metrics to represent these components. We found con- siderable variation in how pollination as an ES – a relatively well-defined service – is measured. We discuss potential causes of this variability and provide suggestions to address this issue. Consistency in ES measure- ment, or a clear explanation of selected definitions and metrics, is critical to facilitate comparisons among studies and inform ecosystem management. Front

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Kate N. Liss

  • Matthew G E Mitchell

  • Graham K. Macdonald

  • Shauna L. Mahajan

  • Josée Méthot

  • Aerin L. Jacob

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free