Wall material effects in stationary plasma thrusters. II. Near-wall and in-wall conductivity

  • Barral S
  • Makowski K
  • Peradzyński Z
 et al. 
  • 60

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 187

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The operation of a laboratory version of the flight-qualified SPT-100 stationary plasma thruster is compared for four different discharge chamber wall materials: a boron nitride–silica mixture ?borosil?, alumina, silicon carbide, and graphite. The discharge is found to be significantly affected by the nature of the walls: changes in operating regimes, up to 25% variations of the mean discharge current, and over 100% variations of the discharge current fluctuation amplitude are observed between materials. Thrust, however, is only moderately affected. Borosil is the only material tested that allows operating the thruster at a low mean current, low fluctuation level and high thrust efficiency regime. It is suggested that secondary electron emission under electron bombardment is the main cause of the observed differences in discharge operation, except for graphite, where the short-circuit current inside the walls is believed to play a major role. It is also suggested that the photoelectric effect, which has apparently not been given attention before in the Hall thruster literature, could increase the cross-field electron current.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • S. Barral

  • K. Makowski

  • Z. Peradzyński

  • N. Gascon

  • M. Dudeck

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free