What can we learn from 38,000 rooms? Reasoning about unexplored space in indoor environments

38Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many robotics tasks require the robot to predict what lies in the unexplored part of the environment. Although much work focuses on building autonomous robots that operate indoors, indoor environments are neither well understood nor analyzed enough in the literature. In this paper, we propose and compare two methods for predicting both the topology and the categories of rooms given a partial map. The methods are motivated by the analysis of two large annotated floor plan data sets corresponding to the buildings of the MIT and KTH campuses. In particular, utilizing graph theory, we discover that local complexity remains unchanged for growing global complexity in real-world indoor environments, a property which we exploit. In total, we analyze 197 buildings, 940 floors and over 38,000 real-world rooms. Such a large set of indoor places has not been investigated before in the previous work. We provide extensive experimental results and show the degree of transferability of spatial knowledge between two geographically distinct locations. We also contribute the KTH data set and the software tools to with it. © 2012 IEEE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aydemir, A., Jensfelt, P., & Folkesson, J. (2012). What can we learn from 38,000 rooms? Reasoning about unexplored space in indoor environments. In IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 4675–4682). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6386110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free