Should we modify the current FIGO staging system for early-stage cervical cancer?

  • Petignat P
  • Loubeyre P
  • 6

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 5

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

In summary, FIGO stage IB1 is strongly diluted and it may be reasonable to stratify FIGO IB1 (less and more than 2 cm) and lymph node status in order to compare results in these women. Conclusion: Staging systems are intended to facilitate data collection and comparative reporting of end results. The current FIGO staging omits statistically significant variables. There is now a large literature suggesting that surgical-pathologic evaluation improves the accuracy of local staging of early-stage cervical cancer and increasing pressure to move toward a surgical-pathological staging for facilitating comparison between trials. Based on these observations, we suggest that the FIGO definition (1995) of early cervical cancer may be improved by adding more details, including lymph node status and tumor size (less and more than 2 cm), in future classification. © 2008 Expert Reviews Ltd.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Patrick Petignat

  • Pierre Loubeyre

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free