Who do we think we are?: Self and reflexivity in social work practice

48Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A counterbalance to evidence-based approaches in public services and professions such as social work is the assertion that professional expertise is more about process than outcome. Postmodern frameworks have prompted practitioners to challenge any notion of objective truth that excludes contradiction, paradox and subjectivity. Rather, workers should seek to engage with service users in a process of negotiating meaning through intersubjectivity and attention to individual experience. Informed by research with women marginalized by mental ill-health, this article examines feminist perspectives of narrative and validating experience in the construction of self. Helping women to 're-story' their lives requires reflexivity by workers, and sensitivity to the management of power in the relationship. Creative autobiography offers a process that enables women to negotiate conflicts between subjective experience and that which is socially constructed. We argue that the challenge for reflexive professional practice is a similar struggle for reconciliation between professional and personal identity. © 2007 Sage Publications Los Angeles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butler, A., Ford, D., & Tregaskis, C. (2007). Who do we think we are?: Self and reflexivity in social work practice. Qualitative Social Work, 6(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325007080402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free