Where what's in common mediates disciplinary diversity in design students: A shared pathway of intellectual development

  • Carmel-Gilfilen C
  • Portillo M
  • 54

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 8

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore intellectual development using the Perry scheme (1968). The authors present findings from a study involving 139 sophomore, junior, and senior architecture and interior design students who were empirically assessed on global and discipline-specific thought development using the Measure of Intellectual Development and the Measure of Designing. Supporting previous research, students were found in the positions of dualism and multiplicity with global thought development proving more advanced than design thinking. Regardless of disciplinary focus, students approached design process, production, and assessment similarly as evidenced in the qualitative data. Copyright © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Perry scheme
  • design education
  • design process
  • epistemology
  • interdisciplinarity

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Candy Carmel-Gilfilen

  • Margaret Portillo

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free