What's Next? Judging Sequences of Binary Events

  • Oskarsson A
  • Van Boven L
  • McClelland G
 et al. 
  • 181

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 79

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The authors review research on judgments of random and nonrandom sequences involving binary events with a focus on studies documenting gambler's fallacy and hot hand beliefs. The domains of judgment include random devices, births, lotteries, sports performances, stock prices, and others. After discussing existing theories of sequence judgments, the authors conclude that in many everyday settings people have naive complex models of the mechanisms they believe generate observed events, and they rely on these models for explanations, predictions, and other inferences about event sequences. The authors next introduce an explanation-based, mental models framework for describing people's beliefs about binary sequences, based on 4 perceived characteristics of the sequence generator: randomness, intentionality, control, and goal complexity. Furthermore, they propose a Markov process framework as a useful theoretical notation for the description of mental models and for the analysis of actual event sequences.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Markov process
  • binary sequence
  • gambler's fallacy
  • hot hand
  • streaks

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • An T. Oskarsson

  • Leaf Van Boven

  • Gary H. McClelland

  • Reid Hastie

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free