Journal article

What's wrong with motive manipulation?

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 10, issue 2 (2007) pp. 129-144

  • 8

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 8

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

Consider manipulation in which one agent, avoiding force, threat, or fraud mobilizes some non-concern motive of another so as to induce this other to behave or move differently than she would otherwise have behaved or moved, given her circumstances and her initial ranking of concerns. As an instance, imagine that I get us to miss the opening of a play that I have grudgingly agreed to attend by engaging your sublimated compulsive tendency to check the stove when we are halfway to the theatre. Such motive manipulation is, I take it, widely regarded as morally worrisome. If it really is morally worrisome, then we should be able to explain adequately why it is so. But existing condemnations of manipulation come up short in this regard. In this paper, I develop and defend a more plausible account of the moral status of this phenomenon.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Bypass conception of autonomy
  • Historical conception of autonomy
  • Manipulation
  • Motive manipulation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Eric M. Cave

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free