The wheelchair procurement process: Perspectives of clients and prescribers

  • Mortenson W
  • Miller W
  • 30


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 25


    Citations of this article.


Background. Increasing choices in assistive technology have made the process of procuring a wheelchair more complex and challenging. Purpose. To explore the intricacies of the procurement process from the perspectives of clients and therapists. Methods. Thirty-four participantswere interviewed, including 13 wheelchair prescribers, 14 wheelchair users, and 7 wheelchair associates (family members and caregivers). Findings. Analysis revealed five main themes. “Who decides?” described varying degrees of client involvement in the procurement process. “Expert knowledge” reflected the expert knowledge that all parties possessed. “Form versus function” captured the primary and, at times, conflicting outcomes that participantswanted to achieve. “Fitting in” depicted the environmental factors that affected wheelchair procurement. “(Re)solutions” illustrated strategies that participants felt improved the process. Implications. This study reveals clients’ experiences with wheelchair procurement, identifies potential issues therapists may encounter, and suggests possible remedies they might consider when prescribing wheelchairs within a client-centred framework

Author-supplied keywords

  • Assistive technology
  • Client-centred practice
  • Mobility assessment

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free