Women with Breast Cancer Talking Causes: Comparing Content, Biographical and Discursive Analyses

  • Wilkinson S
  • 85

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 63

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

This article explores three different approaches – content analytic, biographical and dis- cursive – to analysing the same data set (women with breast cancer talking about causes, and Blaxter’s classic work on ‘lay aetiology’). It compares these three approaches in relation to the key epistemological problems of ‘context’, ‘footing’ and ‘multiple versions’ – and concludes that a discursive approach offers better solutions to these problems than do the other two approaches. Finally, it suggests that both feminist psychology and health psychology would benefit from increased use of discursive approaches, particularly in relation to theorizing ‘experience’.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Biographical analysis
  • Breast cancer
  • Cause
  • Content analysis
  • Context
  • Discursive analysis
  • Epistemology
  • Experience
  • Footing
  • Lay aetiology
  • Multiple versions

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Sue Wilkinson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free