Working out back: The veterinary technician and "Dirty work"

  • Sanders C
  • 39


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 27


    Citations of this article.


Based on three years of ethnographic research in a large, mixed-practice veterinary hospital and semistructured interviews with twenty-two veterinary technicians, this discussion focuses on the work of veterinary technicians, which is, as described by Everett Hughes (1984, 343), “physically disgusting,” “a symbol of degradation,” and “wound(ing to) one’s dignity.” The article briefly describes the vet tech’s career and work activities. The discussion then focuses on how technicians regard and deal with the least appealing of their physical and emotional tasks. Here I emphasize the compensatory role played by the relationships and encounters with nonhuman animals that are central to their work life. The article concludes with an examination of the concept of dirty work and the relationship between dirty work and identity.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Dirty work
  • Emotion work
  • Human-animal relationships
  • Identity
  • Veterinary medicine

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Clinton R. Sanders

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free