Worldwide Screening for Canine Hip Dysplasia: Where Are We Now?

  • Verhoeven G
  • Fortrie R
  • Van Ryssen B
 et al. 
  • 116


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 16


    Citations of this article.


OBJECTIVE: To critically review the different screening systems used for canine hip dysplasia (CHD) and their impact on the prevalence of the disease.

STUDY DESIGN: Critical literature review.

METHODS: Literature search through PubMed (November 1959-October 2011) and the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals (OFA), Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI), British Veterinary Association/Kennel Club (BVA/KC), and Pennsylvania Hip Improvement Program (PennHIP) websites.

RESULTS: The OFA, FCI, and BVA/KC screening methods, which use the hip-extended radiographic projection, have had relatively minor success on CHD prevalence. These screening approaches are prone to conflicting data regarding interobserver agreement. The PennHIP and Dorsolateral Subluxation (DLS) systems, both distraction methods, have not reported on prevalence but seem to be important heritable traits in genomic screening of dysplastic dogs.

CONCLUSION: A shift towards genome screening yields a promising future combating CHD, although further investigation towards fine-mapping in the search for genes, responsible for CHD, is necessary.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Geert Verhoeven

  • Ruth Fortrie

  • Bernadette Van Ryssen

  • Frank Coopman

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free