Skip to content

Action Research: some methodological and political considerations

by Lynne Chisholm
British Educational Research Journal ()
Get full text at journal

Abstract

Action research enjoys an established position in educational thinking and practice. Feminist theory and praxis has inspired and guided anti‐sexist educational policy and practice. However, ‘anti‐sexist’ and ‘mainstream’ action research in education draw on divergent methodological and political discourses. This is revealed in the sense of distance/difference the two traditions can experience when they encounter each other in the educational community. We might alternatively approach the issues raised in such encounters by considering the contradictory elements built into action research itself. These oppositions mirror the dualism of our accustomed ways of thinking. Some characteristic shortcomings of action research projects result from avoiding rather than confronting these contradictory elements. The problems they entail may be ultimately irresolvable, but they cannot be circumvented if action research is not to become increasingly vulnerable to political ‘actionism’.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

11 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
73% Social Sciences
 
18% Business, Management and Accounting
 
9% Agricultural and Biological Sciences
by Academic Status
 
27% Student > Ph. D. Student
 
27% Student > Master
 
18% Professor
by Country
 
9% United Kingdom
 
9% Mexico

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in