Robert Alexy has built his original theory of law upon pervasive claims for "necessary" features of law. In this article, I show that Alexy's claims suffer from two difficulties. First, Alexy is never clear about what he means by "necessity." Second, Alexy writes as if there have been no challenges to claims of conceptual necessity. There have been such challenges and Alexy needs to answer them if his project is to succeed. © 2012 The Author. Ratio Juris © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
CITATION STYLE
Patterson, D. (2012). Alexy on Necessity in Law and Morals. Ratio Juris, 25(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00502.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.