Clinical comparison of tympanic membrane displacement with invasive intracranial pressure measurements

54Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A non-invasive method of assessing intracranial pressure (ICP) would be of benefit to patients with abnormal cerebral pathology that could give rise to changes in ICP. In particular, it would assist the regular monitoring of hydrocephalus patients. This study evaluated a technique using tympanic membrane displacement (TMD) measurements, which has been reported to provide a reliable, non-invasive measure of ICP. A group of 135 hydrocephalus patients was studied, as well as 13 patients with benign intracranial hypertension and a control group of 77 volunteers. TMD measurements were carried out using the Marchbanks measurement system analyser and compared between the groups. In 36 patients, invasive measurements of ICP carried out at the same time were compared with the TMD values. A highly significant relationship was found between TMD and ICP but intersubject variability was high and the predictive value of the technique low. Taking the normal range of ICP to be 10-15 mmHg, the predictive limits of the regression are an order of magnitude wider than this and therefore Vm cannot be used as a surrogate for ICP. In conclusion, TMD measurements do not provide a reliable non-invasive measure of ICP in patients with shunted hydrocephalus. © 2005 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shimbles, S., Dodd, C., Banister, K., Mendelow, A. D., & Chambers, I. R. (2005). Clinical comparison of tympanic membrane displacement with invasive intracranial pressure measurements. Physiological Measurement, 26(6), 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/26/6/017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free