Comparison of continuous spinal and continuous epidural anaesthesia for lower limb surgery in elderly patients A retrospective study

67Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This retrospective study compared continuous spinal anaesthesia with continuous epidural anaesthesia for lower limb orthopaedic surgery in the elderly. The anaesthetic records of 457 patients who received continuous spinal anaesthesia and 274 who received continuous epidural anaesthesia over a 5‐year period were analysed. The patients who had continuous spinal anaesthesia were at a higher anaesthetic risk (ASA 3—4, 76% as compared with 37%, p < 0.001), but the incidence of failures was significantly lower (1.7%, as compared with 9%,p<0.001) and fewer patients showed a decrease in mean arterial pressure of more than30%(44%, ascomparedwith 65%,p < 0.001)and(or)receivedvasopressors(65%, as compared with 77%, p < 0.01). Ourdata show continuous spinal anaesthesia to be more reliable and to provide better cardiovascular stability. Copyright © 1989, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sutter, P. ‐A, Gamulin, Z., & Forster, A. (1989). Comparison of continuous spinal and continuous epidural anaesthesia for lower limb surgery in elderly patients A retrospective study. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11098.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free