Different kinds of decisions and an experiment on unconscious generation of free decisions: A conceptual analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Philosophical issues such as free will and the role of consciousness in human action have become a topic of interest to neuroscience. While this contribution is of great value to extend our knowledge on these issues, the lack of clarity about the concepts being investigated may interfere with the interpretation of the relevant results. An interesting experiment (Bode et al., 2011) that investigates whether decisions are generated consciously or unconsciously suggests a conclusion about whether human beings decide freely. These issues are considered relevant philosophical issues, but the experiment lacks conceptual precision, and this weighs on the interpretations of data and results. I argue that further conceptual analysis of decisions shows that the experiment investigates one kind of decision, while it unwarrantedly draws conclusions about human decisions in general. A better understanding of what is considered to be a decision helps clarify to which extent the results show that decisions are generated unconsciously. This shows that conceptual precision is crucial for research on the area as well as methodological rigor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marques, B. S. (2015). Different kinds of decisions and an experiment on unconscious generation of free decisions: A conceptual analysis. Filosofia Unisinos, 16(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2015.161.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free