Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: Results from a field experiment

156Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We conducted a field experiment comparing hypothetical and real purchase decisions for a pharmacist provided asthma management program among 172 subjects with asthma. Subjects received either a dichotomous choice contingent valuation question or were given the opportunity to actually enroll in the program. Three different prices were used: US$ 15, 40, and 80. In the hypothetical group, 38% of subjects said that they would purchase the good at the stated price, but only 12% of subjects in the real group purchased the good (p=0.000). We cannot, however, reject the null hypothesis that 'definitely sure' hypothetical yes responses, as identified in a follow-up question, correspond to real yes responses. We conclude that the dichotomous choice contingent valuation method overestimates willingness to pay, but that it may be possible to correct for this overestimation by sorting out 'definitely sure' yes responses. Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blumenschein, K., Johannesson, M., Yokoyama, K. K., & Freeman, P. R. (2001). Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: Results from a field experiment. Journal of Health Economics, 20(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00075-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free